nursing home in Sioux Falls, SD

Dow Rummel Village

1321 W Dow Rummel St, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 · (605) 336-1490

★★★★★3
Average
CMS overall star rating
  • Health inspections★★★★★2
  • Staffing★★★★★5
  • Quality measures★★★★★4

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. We refresh our information from this source. About our data

Dow Rummel Village at a glance

Dow Rummel Village is a 50-bed non-profit nursing home in Sioux Falls, South Dakota (Minnehaha County).

CMS gives it 3 out of 5 stars on its overall star rating, close to the South Dakota average of 2.9.

Residents receive about 5.1 hours of nursing care per day (0.8 of them from registered nurses), better than the state average of 3.8 hours.

Its most recent standard health inspection (January 8, 2026) found 6 health citations. The South Dakota average is 6.7.

Federal regulators fined it 5 times in the past three years, totaling $87,723.

Nursing staff turnover is 31.5% per year (state average 48.2%).

Facility details

Type
Nursing home
Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
Beds
50
Certified for
Medicare and Medicaid
Medicare-certified since
February 16, 2010
Continuing care retirement community
Yes
Resident/family council
Resident
County
Minnehaha County
CMS Certification Number
435127

Ratings

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Overall star rating ⓘ (higher is better)3 / 52.9 / 53 / 5Average
Health inspection rating ⓘ (higher is better)2 / 52.9 / 52.8 / 5Worse
Staffing rating ⓘ (higher is better)5 / 53.5 / 52.9 / 5Better
Quality measures rating ⓘ (higher is better)4 / 52.7 / 53.6 / 5Average
Long-stay quality rating (higher is better)3 / 52.6 / 53.8 / 5Worse
Short-stay (rehab) quality rating (higher is better)5 / 53.3 / 53.3 / 5Better

Staffing

This facility5.10 hrsSouth Dakota average3.79 hrsU.S. average3.86 hrs
Total nurse staff hours per resident per day: this facility vs. South Dakota and U.S. averages
MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Total nurse staff hours per resident per day ⓘ (higher is better)5.10 hrs3.79 hrs3.86 hrsBetter
Registered nurse hours per resident per day (higher is better)0.82 hrs0.80 hrs0.69 hrsBetter
Nurse aide hours per resident per day (higher is better)3.57 hrs2.52 hrs2.32 hrsBetter
Weekend nurse staff hours per resident per day (higher is better)4.24 hrs3.26 hrs3.42 hrsBetter
Nursing staff turnover (yearly) (lower is better)31.5%48.2%45.8%Better
Registered nurse turnover (yearly) (lower is better)36.4%34.7%42.9%Better
Administrators who left in the past year (lower is better)001Better

Inspections

This facility6South Dakota average7U.S. average9
Health citations in the most recent inspection: this facility vs. South Dakota and U.S. averages
MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Health citations in the most recent inspection (lower is better)679Better
Citations from complaint investigations (latest cycle) (lower is better)323Worse
Weighted health inspection score ⓘ (lower is better)7472.280.6Better

Penalties

This facility5South Dakota average2U.S. average1
Fines in the past 3 years: this facility vs. South Dakota and U.S. averages
MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Fines in the past 3 years (lower is better)521Worse
Total fines in the past 3 years (lower is better)$87,723$40,815$30,972Worse
All federal penalties in the past 3 years (lower is better)521Worse

Size

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Certified beds5061107
Average residents per day465286
Occupancy91.6%85.2%80.9%

Long-stay residents

This facility3.7%South Dakota average5.5%U.S. average3.2%
Long-stay residents with a fall causing major injury: this facility vs. South Dakota and U.S. averages
MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Long-stay residents with a fall causing major injury (lower is better)3.7%5.5%3.2%Worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (lower is better)4.8%4.6%4.6%Average
Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication (lower is better)7.9%24.6%15.4%Better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (lower is better)0%2.9%1.6%Better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in the bladder (lower is better)2.1%2.1%0.8%Worse
Long-stay residents needing more help with daily activities (lower is better)23.6%21.3%13.9%Worse
Long-stay residents whose walking worsened (lower is better)28.9%19.4%14.1%Worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight (lower is better)7.8%5.6%5.2%Worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms (lower is better)10.1%5.7%12.8%Better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained (lower is better)0%0%0.1%Better
Long-stay residents given anti-anxiety or sleep medication (lower is better)15.4%17.4%19.5%Better
Long-stay residents with new or worse incontinence (lower is better)29.7%25.4%19%Worse
Long-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better)91.1%96.9%95.5%Average
Long-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better)93.8%94.9%93.6%Average

Short-stay residents

This facility0%South Dakota average2%U.S. average1.6%
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotic medication: this facility vs. South Dakota and U.S. averages
MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avg.U.S. avg.vs. U.S.
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotic medication (lower is better)0%2%1.6%Better
Short-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better)84.8%78.2%79.8%Better
Short-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better)86.3%83.5%82%Better

Inspection citations

State inspectors cited this home for 10 health deficiencies and 5 fire safety deficiencies in the inspection records CMS currently publishes. 4 citations involved actual harm.

DateCitationSeverityStatus
June 10, 2026
Complaint
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0689
G
Actual harm, isolated
Corrected August 1, 2026
January 8, 2026
Fire safety
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0355
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected January 13, 2026
January 8, 2026
Standard
Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Environmental Deficiencies · Tag F0921
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected February 22, 2026
January 8, 2026
Standard
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Infection Control Deficiencies · Tag F0880
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected February 22, 2026
January 8, 2026
Standard
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Tag F0812
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected February 22, 2026
November 13, 2025
Complaint
Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Tag F0760
G
Actual harm, isolated
Corrected December 14, 2025
October 30, 2025
Complaint
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0689
G
Actual harm, isolated
Corrected November 29, 2025
August 21, 2024
Complaint
Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Tag F0806
G
Actual harm, isolated
Corrected September 11, 2024
August 21, 2024
Complaint
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0656
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected September 11, 2024
August 15, 2024
Fire safety
Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0362
F
Potential harm, widespread
Corrected September 13, 2024
August 15, 2024
Fire safety
Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0325
E
Potential harm, pattern
Corrected September 13, 2024
August 15, 2024
Standard
Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Administration Deficiencies · Tag F0851
F
Potential harm, widespread
Corrected August 15, 2024
April 26, 2023
Fire safety
Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
Egress Deficiencies · Tag K0293
D
Potential harm, isolated
Corrected May 31, 2023
April 26, 2023
Fire safety
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Miscellaneous Deficiencies · Tag K0712
D
Potential harm, isolated
Corrected June 9, 2023
April 26, 2023
Standard
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Tag F0812
D
Potential harm, isolated
Corrected June 9, 2023

Severity letters follow the CMS scope-and-severity grid: A–C no actual harm with potential for minimal harm; D–F potential for more than minimal harm; G–I actual harm; J–L immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety. How to read inspection citations.

Fines and payment denials

CMS reports 4 federal penalties in the past three years, including $70,378 in fines.

DatePenaltyAmount / length
June 10, 2026Fine$16,350
January 8, 2026Fine$28,665
October 30, 2025Fine$17,345
August 15, 2024Fine$8,018

Owners and managers

Individuals and organizations reported to CMS as owning or operating this nursing home.

NameRoleShareSince
GARRY, RICH
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
HODGSON, ALAN
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2009
JAMISON, MICHAEL
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
LENKER, WILLIAM
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
NOORDERMEER, TAMARA
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
SWEDEEN, HOLLY
Individual
corporate directorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
KAUFMAN, KEVIN
Individual
corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2006
VON ROSENDALE, DARLA
Individual
corporate officerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2004
HAHN, CHRISTOPHER
Individual
operational/managerial controlNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2022

Other nursing homes near Dow Rummel Village

  1. Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Center

    401 West Second Street, Sioux Falls, SD 57104 · under 1 mi

    Non-profit · 98 beds · Part of Good Samaritan Society

    • Abuse citation
    ★★★★★2Below average
  2. Bethany Home Sioux Falls

    1901 South Holly Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 · 2.2 mi

    Non-profit · 54 beds

    ★★★★★3Average
  3. Good Samaritan Society Luther Manor

    1500 W 38th St, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 · 2.9 mi

    For-profit · 92 beds · Part of Good Samaritan Society

    ★★★★★2Below average
  4. Avantara Norton

    3600 South Norton Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57105 · 3.3 mi

    For-profit · 110 beds · Part of Legacy Healthcare

    • Special Focus Facility
    • Abuse citation
    Not rated
  5. Good Samaritan Society Sioux Falls Village

    3901 S Marion Rd, Sioux Falls, SD 57106 · 4.1 mi

    Non-profit · 177 beds · Part of Good Samaritan Society

    ★★★★★2Below average
  6. Avera Prince of Peace

    4513 South Prince of Peace Place, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 · 5 mi

    Non-profit · 126 beds · Part of Avera Health

    ★★★★★4Above average

All nursing homes in Sioux Falls, SD · Compare side by side

Frequently asked questions

What is Dow Rummel Village's rating?

Dow Rummel Village has 3 out of 5 stars on the CMS overall star rating. The average for South Dakota nursing homes is 2.9 stars.

How many inspection citations did Dow Rummel Village receive?

Its most recent standard health inspection found 6 citations, compared with a South Dakota average of 6.7. Every citation is listed on this page with its severity.

Does Dow Rummel Village accept Medicare and Medicaid?

CMS lists it as certified for: Medicare and Medicaid. Call the facility to confirm bed availability and whether it accepts your specific plan.

Who owns Dow Rummel Village?

It is non profit - corporation. The ownership section on this page lists the owners and managers reported to CMS.

Where is Dow Rummel Village and how do I contact it?

Dow Rummel Village is at 1321 W Dow Rummel St, Sioux Falls, SD 57104. Phone: (605) 336-1490.

About this data

Ratings and measures come from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. They're based on state inspections, patient surveys and facility reports, and they describe the past. Facilities change, so visit in person and confirm details directly. About our data · Spotted an error? Let us know.