nursing home in Orangeburg, SC
The Oaks Post Acute
151 Lovely Drive, Orangeburg, SC 29115 · (803) 534-1212
CMS overall star rating
- Health inspections★★★★★1
- Staffing★★★★★2
- Quality measures★★★★★4
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. We refresh our information from this source. About our data
The Oaks Post Acute at a glance
The Oaks Post Acute is a 122-bed for-profit nursing home in Orangeburg, South Carolina (Orangeburg County).
CMS gives it 1 out of 5 stars on its overall star rating, worse than the South Carolina average of 3.
Residents receive about 3.1 hours of nursing care per day (0.2 of them from registered nurses), worse than the state average of 3.8 hours.
Its most recent standard health inspection (January 13, 2026) found 8 health citations. The South Carolina average is 3.6.
Federal regulators fined it 11 times in the past three years, totaling $94,020.
Nursing staff turnover is 45.3% per year (state average 45.9%).
Facility details
- Type
- Nursing home
- Ownership
- For Profit - Limited Liability Company
- Beds
- 122
- Certified for
- Medicare and Medicaid
- Chain / affiliated entity
- Pacs Group
- Medicare-certified since
- July 1, 1978
- Resident/family council
- Resident
- County
- Orangeburg County
- CMS Certification Number
- 425131
Ratings
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall star rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 1 / 5 | 3 / 5 | 3 / 5 | Worse |
| Health inspection rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 1 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | 2.8 / 5 | Worse |
| Staffing rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 2 / 5 | 3 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | Worse |
| Quality measures rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 4 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 | Average |
| Long-stay quality rating (higher is better) | 5 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | Better |
| Short-stay (rehab) quality rating (higher is better) | 3 / 5 | 3 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 | Average |
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staff hours per resident per day ⓘ (higher is better) | 3.08 hrs | 3.84 hrs | 3.86 hrs | Worse |
| Registered nurse hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 0.16 hrs | 0.63 hrs | 0.69 hrs | Worse |
| Nurse aide hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 1.80 hrs | 2.19 hrs | 2.32 hrs | Worse |
| Weekend nurse staff hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 2.74 hrs | 3.33 hrs | 3.42 hrs | Worse |
| Nursing staff turnover (yearly) (lower is better) | 45.3% | 45.9% | 45.8% | Average |
| Registered nurse turnover (yearly) (lower is better) | 37.5% | 42.1% | 42.9% | Better |
| Administrators who left in the past year (lower is better) | 1 | 0 | 1 | Worse |
Inspections
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health citations in the most recent inspection (lower is better) | 8 | 4 | 9 | Better |
| Citations from complaint investigations (latest cycle) (lower is better) | 1 | 1 | 3 | Better |
| Weighted health inspection score ⓘ (lower is better) | 92.3 | 42.5 | 80.6 | Worse |
Penalties
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fines in the past 3 years (lower is better) | 11 | 1 | 1 | Worse |
| Total fines in the past 3 years (lower is better) | $94,020 | $14,833 | $30,972 | Worse |
| All federal penalties in the past 3 years (lower is better) | 11 | 1 | 1 | Worse |
Size
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certified beds | 122 | 105 | 107 | |
| Average residents per day | 115 | 92 | 86 | |
| Occupancy | 93.9% | 87.9% | 80.9% |
Long-stay residents
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents with a fall causing major injury (lower is better) | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.2% | Average |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (lower is better) | 6.1% | 5.1% | 4.6% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication (lower is better) | 16.1% | 15.3% | 15.4% | Average |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (lower is better) | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.6% | Better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in the bladder (lower is better) | 0% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Better |
| Long-stay residents needing more help with daily activities (lower is better) | 8.4% | 11.9% | 13.9% | Better |
| Long-stay residents whose walking worsened (lower is better) | 5.4% | 12.7% | 14.1% | Better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight (lower is better) | 8.9% | 6.3% | 5.2% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms (lower is better) | 0.8% | 3.1% | 12.8% | Better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained (lower is better) | 0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Better |
| Long-stay residents given anti-anxiety or sleep medication (lower is better) | 15% | 21% | 19.5% | Better |
| Long-stay residents with new or worse incontinence (lower is better) | 6.6% | 16.7% | 19% | Better |
| Long-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better) | 62.7% | 90.6% | 95.5% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better) | 22.8% | 91.7% | 93.6% | Worse |
Short-stay residents
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotic medication (lower is better) | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.6% | Better |
| Short-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better) | 26.6% | 78% | 79.8% | Worse |
| Short-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better) | 18.8% | 81.5% | 82% | Worse |
Inspection citations
State inspectors cited this home for 21 health deficiencies and 0 fire safety deficiencies in the inspection records CMS currently publishes. 1 citation involved actual harm, including 1 rated "immediate jeopardy".
| Date | Citation | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Tag F0812 | F Potential harm, widespread | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs. Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Tag F0761 | E Potential harm, pattern | Corrected March 26, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Complaint | Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. Resident Rights Deficiencies · Tag F0584 | E Potential harm, pattern | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0689 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0684 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home. Resident Rights Deficiencies · Tag F0568 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Infection Control Deficiencies · Tag F0880 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| January 13, 2026 Standard | Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0695 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected February 17, 2026 |
| June 24, 2025 Complaint | Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money. Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Tag F0602 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected July 18, 2025 |
| March 10, 2025 Complaint | Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment. Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0641 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected April 4, 2025 |
| March 10, 2025 Complaint | Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs. Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Tag F0761 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected April 4, 2025 |
| November 5, 2024 Standard | Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0678 | J Immediate jeopardy, isolated | Corrected December 2, 2024 |
| November 5, 2024 Standard | Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Tag F0812 | F Potential harm, widespread | Corrected December 2, 2024 |
| November 5, 2024 Standard | Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs. Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Tag F0761 | F Potential harm, widespread | Corrected December 2, 2024 |
| November 5, 2024 Standard | Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0677 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected December 2, 2024 |
| November 5, 2024 Standard | Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0656 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected December 2, 2024 |
| June 14, 2024 Complaint | Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident. Resident Rights Deficiencies · Tag F0580 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected July 10, 2024 |
| June 14, 2024 Complaint | Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. Resident Rights Deficiencies · Tag F0585 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected July 10, 2024 |
| October 7, 2022 Standard | PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0645 | E Potential harm, pattern | Corrected October 28, 2022 |
| October 7, 2022 Standard | Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0684 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected October 28, 2022 |
| October 7, 2022 Standard | Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment. Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0640 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected October 28, 2022 |
Severity letters follow the CMS scope-and-severity grid: A–C no actual harm with potential for minimal harm; D–F potential for more than minimal harm; G–I actual harm; J–L immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety. How to read inspection citations.
Fines and payment denials
CMS reports 11 federal penalties in the past three years, including $94,020 in fines.
| Date | Penalty | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| January 13, 2026 | Fine | $9,480 |
| November 5, 2024 | Fine | $13,627 |
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $14,814 |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $4,587 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
| November 20, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 13, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 23, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
Owners and managers
Individuals and organizations reported to CMS as owning or operating this nursing home.
| Name | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST BANK Organization | 5% or greater security interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/2024 |
| ARTS, JEFF Individual | adp of the snf | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/18/2025 |
| KIZER, MELISSA Individual | adp of the snf | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| ORANGEBURG SC PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC Organization | adp of the snf | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| PROVIDENCE ADMINISTRATIVE CONSULTING SERVICES INC Organization | adp of the snf | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2024 |
| TRUIST BANK Organization | adp of the snf | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/16/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA Individual | corporate officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN Individual | corporate officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA Individual | managing control - governing body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN Individual | managing control - governing body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2024 |
| ARTS, JEFF Individual | operational/managerial control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2024 |
| JERGENSEN, JOSHUA Individual | operational/managerial control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2024 |
| KIZER, MELISSA Individual | operational/managerial control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2024 |
| MITCHELL, JOHN Individual | operational/managerial control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/18/2024 |
| WILLIAMS, VANNA Individual | operational/managerial control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2024 |
Other nursing homes near The Oaks Post Acute
Jolley Acres Healthcare Center
1180 Wolfe Trail, Orangeburg, SC 29115 · 3.8 mi
For-profit · 60 beds · Part of Fundamental Healthcare
★★★★★4Above averageEdisto Post Acute
575 Stonewall Jackson Boulevard, Orangeburg, SC 29115 · 4.2 mi
For-profit · 113 beds · Part of Pacs Group
★★★★★1Much below averagePruitthealth- Orangeburg
755 Whitman Street SE, Orangeburg, SC 29115 · 4.8 mi
For-profit · 88 beds · Part of Pruitthealth
★★★★★3AveragePruitthealth- Bamberg
439 North Street, Bamberg, SC 29003 · 13 mi
For-profit · 88 beds · Part of Pruitthealth
★★★★★2Below averageCalhoun Convalescent Center
601 Dantzler Street, Saint Matthews, SC 29135 · 16.9 mi
For-profit · 120 beds · Part of Fundamental Healthcare
- Abuse citation
★★★★★1Much below averageSt George Healthcare Center
905 Duke Street, Saint George, SC 29477 · 22.5 mi
For-profit · 88 beds · Part of Fundamental Healthcare
★★★★★3Average
Frequently asked questions
What is The Oaks Post Acute's rating?
The Oaks Post Acute has 1 out of 5 stars on the CMS overall star rating. The average for South Carolina nursing homes is 3 stars.
How many inspection citations did The Oaks Post Acute receive?
Its most recent standard health inspection found 8 citations, compared with a South Carolina average of 3.6. Every citation is listed on this page with its severity.
Does The Oaks Post Acute accept Medicare and Medicaid?
CMS lists it as certified for: Medicare and Medicaid. Call the facility to confirm bed availability and whether it accepts your specific plan.
Who owns The Oaks Post Acute?
It is for profit - limited liability company and part of Pacs Group. The ownership section on this page lists the owners and managers reported to CMS.
Where is The Oaks Post Acute and how do I contact it?
The Oaks Post Acute is at 151 Lovely Drive, Orangeburg, SC 29115. Phone: (803) 534-1212.
About this data
Ratings and measures come from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. They're based on state inspections, patient surveys and facility reports, and they describe the past. Facilities change, so visit in person and confirm details directly. About our data · Spotted an error? Let us know.