nursing home in Laurinburg, NC
Scotia Village - SNF
2200 Elm Drive, Laurinburg, NC 28352 · (910) 277-2000
CMS overall star rating
- Health inspections★★★★★5
- Staffing★★★★★5
- Quality measures★★★★★3
- CMS high performer
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. We refresh our information from this source. About our data
Scotia Village - SNF at a glance
Scotia Village - SNF is a 58-bed non-profit nursing home in Laurinburg, North Carolina (Scotland County).
CMS gives it 5 out of 5 stars on its overall star rating, better than the North Carolina average of 2.9.
Residents receive about 5.4 hours of nursing care per day (0.9 of them from registered nurses), better than the state average of 3.9 hours.
Its most recent standard health inspection (December 31, 2025) found 0 health citations. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
It has not received a federal fine in the past three years.
Nursing staff turnover is 41.2% per year (state average 49%).
Facility details
- Type
- Nursing home
- Ownership
- Non Profit - Corporation
- Beds
- 58
- Certified for
- Medicare and Medicaid
- Medicare-certified since
- February 27, 1989
- Continuing care retirement community
- Yes
- Resident/family council
- Resident
- County
- Scotland County
- CMS Certification Number
- 345297
Ratings
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall star rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 5 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | 3 / 5 | Better |
| Health inspection rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 5 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | 2.8 / 5 | Better |
| Staffing rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 5 / 5 | 2.7 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | Better |
| Quality measures rating ⓘ (higher is better) | 3 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 | Worse |
| Long-stay quality rating (higher is better) | 4 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | Average |
| Short-stay (rehab) quality rating (higher is better) | 3 / 5 | 3 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 | Average |
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staff hours per resident per day ⓘ (higher is better) | 5.44 hrs | 3.85 hrs | 3.86 hrs | Better |
| Registered nurse hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 0.86 hrs | 0.62 hrs | 0.69 hrs | Better |
| Nurse aide hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 3.16 hrs | 2.34 hrs | 2.32 hrs | Better |
| Weekend nurse staff hours per resident per day (higher is better) | 4.72 hrs | 3.42 hrs | 3.42 hrs | Better |
| Nursing staff turnover (yearly) (lower is better) | 41.2% | 49% | 45.8% | Better |
| Registered nurse turnover (yearly) (lower is better) | 12.5% | 45.6% | 42.9% | Better |
| Administrators who left in the past year (lower is better) | 0 | 1 | 1 | Better |
Inspections
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health citations in the most recent inspection (lower is better) | 0 | 5 | 9 | Better |
| Citations from complaint investigations (latest cycle) (lower is better) | 0 | 2 | 3 | Better |
| Weighted health inspection score ⓘ (lower is better) | 3 | 49.2 | 80.6 | Better |
Penalties
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fines in the past 3 years (lower is better) | 0 | 1 | 1 | Better |
| Total fines in the past 3 years (lower is better) | $0 | $36,617 | $30,972 | Better |
| All federal penalties in the past 3 years (lower is better) | 0 | 1 | 1 | Better |
Size
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certified beds | 58 | 105 | 107 | |
| Average residents per day | 54 | 87 | 86 | |
| Occupancy | 93.4% | 83.6% | 80.9% |
Long-stay residents
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents with a fall causing major injury (lower is better) | 6.6% | 3.5% | 3.2% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers (lower is better) | 4.1% | 5.5% | 4.6% | Better |
| Long-stay residents given antipsychotic medication (lower is better) | 4.9% | 14% | 15.4% | Better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection (lower is better) | 1% | 2.3% | 1.6% | Better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in the bladder (lower is better) | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.8% | Better |
| Long-stay residents needing more help with daily activities (lower is better) | 12.9% | 15.6% | 13.9% | Better |
| Long-stay residents whose walking worsened (lower is better) | 12.6% | 18.3% | 14.1% | Better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight (lower is better) | 7.7% | 7.2% | 5.2% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms (lower is better) | 2.7% | 5.9% | 12.8% | Better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained (lower is better) | 0% | 0% | 0.1% | Better |
| Long-stay residents given anti-anxiety or sleep medication (lower is better) | 18.9% | 21.3% | 19.5% | Average |
| Long-stay residents with new or worse incontinence (lower is better) | 20.1% | 20.7% | 19% | Worse |
| Long-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better) | 98% | 94.1% | 95.5% | Average |
| Long-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better) | 99.5% | 92% | 93.6% | Better |
Short-stay residents
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg. | U.S. avg. | vs. U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotic medication (lower is better) | 0% | 1.4% | 1.6% | Better |
| Short-stay residents given a flu vaccine (higher is better) | 92.7% | 78.1% | 79.8% | Better |
| Short-stay residents given a pneumonia vaccine (higher is better) | 98.6% | 80.6% | 82% | Better |
Inspection citations
State inspectors cited this home for 4 health deficiencies and 5 fire safety deficiencies in the inspection records CMS currently publishes. None were rated as causing actual harm to residents.
| Date | Citation | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| November 7, 2024 Fire safety | Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility. Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0341 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected January 15, 2025 |
| November 7, 2024 Fire safety | Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas. Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies · Tag K0923 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected January 15, 2025 |
| November 7, 2024 Standard | Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program. Infection Control Deficiencies · Tag F0880 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected November 22, 2024 |
| November 7, 2024 Standard | Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing. Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Tag F0686 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected November 22, 2024 |
| November 7, 2024 Standard | Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards. Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Tag F0842 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected November 22, 2024 |
| September 14, 2023 Fire safety | Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke. Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0363 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected October 31, 2023 |
| September 14, 2023 Standard | Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money. Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Tag F0602 | E Potential harm, pattern | Corrected May 27, 2023 |
| May 26, 2022 Fire safety | Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency. Egress Deficiencies · Tag K0211 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected June 30, 2022 |
| May 26, 2022 Fire safety | Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility. Smoke Deficiencies · Tag K0341 | D Potential harm, isolated | Corrected June 30, 2022 |
Severity letters follow the CMS scope-and-severity grid: A–C no actual harm with potential for minimal harm; D–F potential for more than minimal harm; G–I actual harm; J–L immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety. How to read inspection citations.
Fines and payment denials
CMS reports no federal fines or payment denials in the past three years.
Owners and managers
Individuals and organizations reported to CMS as owning or operating this nursing home.
| Name | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUBBIAH, MURUGANANTHAN Individual | contracted managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2023 |
| HANOVER, JULIA Individual | corporate director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
| JOHNSON, ARTHUR Individual | corporate director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2015 |
| LOVVORN, CREIGHTON Individual | corporate director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
| WEBSTER, TIMOTHY Individual | corporate director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
| COLLINS, MARK Individual | w-2 managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/04/2012 |
| HANOVER, JULIA Individual | w-2 managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
| JOHNSON, ARTHUR Individual | w-2 managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2015 |
| LOVVORN, CREIGHTON Individual | w-2 managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
| WEBSTER, TIMOTHY Individual | w-2 managing employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/28/2010 |
Other nursing homes near Scotia Village - SNF
Scottish Pines Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
620 Johns Road, Laurinburg, NC 28352 · 2.1 mi
For-profit · 149 beds · Part of Century Care Management
★★★★★4Above averageBennettsville Health and Rehabilitation Center
710 15-401 Bypass, West, Bennettsville, SC 29512 · 10.2 mi
For-profit · 110 beds · Part of Fundamental Healthcare
★★★★★1Much below averageRichmond Pines Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente
Highway 177 S, Hamlet, NC 28345 · 16.1 mi
For-profit · 105 beds · Part of Principle Long Term Care
★★★★★3AveragePembroke Center
310 E Wardell Drive, Pembroke, NC 28372 · 17.7 mi
For-profit · 84 beds · Part of Genesis Healthcare
- Abuse citation
★★★★★1Much below averagePruitthealth-Rockingham
804 South Long Drive, Rockingham, NC 28379 · 20.1 mi
For-profit · 120 beds · Part of Pruitthealth
★★★★★4Above averagePruitthealth- Dillon
413 Lakeside Court, Dillon, SC 29536 · 22.4 mi
For-profit · 84 beds · Part of Pruitthealth
★★★★★3Average
Frequently asked questions
What is Scotia Village - SNF's rating?
Scotia Village - SNF has 5 out of 5 stars on the CMS overall star rating. The average for North Carolina nursing homes is 2.9 stars.
How many inspection citations did Scotia Village - SNF receive?
Its most recent standard health inspection found 0 citations, compared with a North Carolina average of 4.7. Every citation is listed on this page with its severity.
Does Scotia Village - SNF accept Medicare and Medicaid?
CMS lists it as certified for: Medicare and Medicaid. Call the facility to confirm bed availability and whether it accepts your specific plan.
Who owns Scotia Village - SNF?
It is non profit - corporation. The ownership section on this page lists the owners and managers reported to CMS.
Where is Scotia Village - SNF and how do I contact it?
Scotia Village - SNF is at 2200 Elm Drive, Laurinburg, NC 28352. Phone: (910) 277-2000.
About this data
Ratings and measures come from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Care Compare. They're based on state inspections, patient surveys and facility reports, and they describe the past. Facilities change, so visit in person and confirm details directly. About our data · Spotted an error? Let us know.